Planet

OFAC License or Clearance: What Your Business Needs to Work with U.S. Sanctions

Sanctions imposed by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) create a complex legal environment for companies worldwide. These restrictions affect not only American organizations but also any business integrated into the international financial system. Understanding the available legal tools becomes not just an advantage but a necessity for survival. The two main paths are obtaining an OFAC license and undergoing the clearance procedure. The choice between them entirely depends on your unique situation and ultimate goals.

What is OFAC and why do its decisions affect the whole world?

The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is a division of the U.S. Department of the Treasury authorized to administer and enforce trade and economic sanctions. Its main task is to support the national security and foreign policy objectives of the United States. It achieves this by prohibiting or restricting transactions with certain countries, organizations, and individuals.

OFAC decisions have extraterritorial effect, which forces businesses far beyond the borders of the USA to comply with them. This happens because most international transactions go through American correspondent banks or are denominated in US dollars. Any such operation automatically falls under OFAC jurisdiction. Therefore, even companies without a direct presence in America face risks of payment and asset blockages if their counterparties end up on sanction lists.

OFAC License: Your official permission for specific operations

An OFAC license is not a pardon but an official document that grants permission to conduct a specific transaction or engage in activities prohibited by the current sanctions regime. It represents an authorized exception to the general rules. Having a license allows for legally completing a deal or continuing a project without violating the law.

To develop the correct strategy, it is necessary to understand the difference between the two main types of licenses issued by OFAC. This choice determines both the application process and the scope of permitted activities. These types differ in their coverage and mechanism of action.

The following types of licenses exist:

  • General licenses: published on the OFAC website and allow certain categories of transactions for anyone who meets their conditions, for example, for sending humanitarian aid or providing certain legal services;
  • Special licenses: issued on a private basis to a specific individual or company after submitting an application and grant permission for an operation not covered by a general license.

The need for a license arises in specific business situations. For example, it may be required to unlock funds for paying employees’ salaries. Or to complete a commercial contract that was interrupted by the sudden imposition of sanctions against your partner.

OFAC Clearance: Full removal of sanctions and restoration of rights

The OFAC clearance procedure pursues a completely different goal. It is not about obtaining permission to operate within the framework of sanctions but an official confirmation from OFAC that restrictions on an individual or legal entity are fully lifted. Essentially, it is the process of exiting from under sanction pressure.

The ultimate result of a successful clearance process is “delisting” — the formal removal of a person from a sanctions list, such as the SDN List. The consequences of this step are profound. There is a complete unfreezing of all previously blocked assets, and the company or individual regains the right to conduct business without restrictions with American and other international partners. Successful delisting also serves as a powerful signal to banks and investors, restoring business reputation.

License vs. Clearance: Key Differences

The choice between a license and the clearance procedure determines the entire subsequent strategy of interaction with the regulator. It affects the collection of documents, legal argumentation, and, most importantly, the final result. To make the right decision, it is necessary to clearly understand their differences.

CriterionOFAC LicenceOFAC Clearance
GoalPermission for a specific operation.Complete removal of sanction restrictions.
ResultTemporary permission for a prohibited action.Exclusion from the sanctions list (delisting).
Legal consequencesSanctions against the individual remain in force.Sanctions are completely lifted.
Who is it suitable forFor those who want to make a deal under sanctions.To those who are already on the sanctions list.

The process of obtaining: from submitting an application to the OFAC decision

The path to obtaining permission from OFAC is a multi-stage procedure requiring thorough preparation. The process begins with an in-depth analysis of the situation and the collection of comprehensive evidence. Then follows the preparation and submission of a legally precise application to the agency. After this comes the review stage, which may include additional requests from OFAC.

The timelines for receiving a response from the agency are extremely unpredictable. They depend on numerous factors: the complexity of the case, the quality of the presented arguments, the workload of the agency itself, and even the current geopolitical agenda. An application for a simple license may be reviewed within a few months, while the process of lifting sanctions (delisting) often takes a year or even longer.

Many independent attempts to interact with OFAC end in failure due to typical mistakes. These missteps not only lead to rejection but can also complicate subsequent appeals, as they create a negative case history. It is important to avoid common pitfalls.

Common mistakes made by applicants include:

  • Incomplete or inaccurate information: providing OFAC data that raises doubts or concealing material facts;
  • Weak legal argumentation: lack of clear evidence that the applicant’s situation meets the criteria for obtaining a license or lifting sanctions;
  • Ignoring context: submitting a request without considering the current U.S. foreign policy and established OFAC practices in similar cases;
  • Incorrect type of request: a demand for the complete lifting of sanctions when circumstances only allow for obtaining a special license.

Consequences of Ignoring OFAC Requirements

An attempt to conduct activities requiring a license without obtaining one entails extremely serious consequences. The financial risks are enormous. Fines can amount to millions of dollars, often exceeding the sum of the transaction itself. In addition to fines, OFAC may block all assets and accounts of the company, paralyzing its operations. For individuals and company management, there is also a risk of criminal prosecution.

How does professional legal assistance speed up the process?

U.S. sanctions law is a highly specialized and complex area of law where the cost of error is high. Engaging a specialized lawyer allows for building competent communication with the regulator. The specialist not only knows the laws but also understands the internal logic and unwritten rules of the agency’s operations.
A qualified lawyer performs several functions. He conducts an initial audit of the situation to assess the chances of success. Then he helps to collect and formalize the evidence base, forming a convincing dossier. Finally, he drafts and submits the petition, as well as conducts all negotiations with OFAC, acting on behalf of the client and protecting their interests.

So, the key takeaway is simple: a license is a tactical tool for solving a specific operational task, while clearance is a strategic goal for fully exiting the sanctions regime. The right choice depends not on what is “better,” but on what is achievable and necessary in your situation.
The first step on this path should be a balanced and professional assessment of all circumstances. Hasty actions or an incorrectly chosen strategy may not only fail to bring results but also worsen the situation.

If you or your company are facing OFAC restrictions, contact us for an initial analysis of your case. Professional consultation will help you understand which path—obtaining a license or working on lifting sanctions—is the most relevant and promising for you. You will gain a clear understanding of possible next steps.

Marina Mkrtchieva
Senior Associate, Attorney-at-law, admitted to the Bar (Certificate to practice Law #001068)
Maryna Mkrtycheva, a ‘Top 30 Lawyers Under 30’ honoree, is a dedicated International Criminal Law practitioner. Her skill set covers extradition proceedings, ECHR and Interpol client representation, and shaping EU human rights regulations. She also provides robust defense in white-collar, corruption, and politically sensitive cases, with a steadfast dedication to achieving justice and safeguarding client rights.

    Planet
    Planet